| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Aruken Marr
BSC LEGION Tactical Narcotics Team
124
|
Posted - 2012.05.28 00:46:00 -
[1] - Quote
"I am an extremely successful businessman who jets around the world ******* foreign women, bathing in foreign shores and eating foreign foods. I play EVE every now and again when I've ran out of things to do. My opinion therefore, is worth more than yours." |

Aruken Marr
BSC LEGION Tactical Narcotics Team
124
|
Posted - 2012.05.28 01:58:00 -
[2] - Quote
Oddball Six wrote:
Which are clearly effective [/sarcasm].
I think that's the problem, none of these are particularly effective in a high sec zone. Particularly when these individuals are able to dock at stations, etc, as if nothing had happened.
You give em an inch and they take a ******* mile.
Insurance payouts were recently taken away for losses caused by concord. That change made a lot of sense and forced gankers to make things a little more cost effective.
So you want to take more? Why not just request the removal of non-consensual pvp from hisec seeing as thats what youll be asking for 3 months after they introduced said fines...
...and another thing; there's nothing more vile being spilled out by you lot than the claim that you should be allowed to mine in peace because after all this is a sandbox game and youre free to do whatever you like. God forbid anyone trying to stop you because as we all know its a sandbox game... |

Aruken Marr
BSC LEGION Tactical Narcotics Team
125
|
Posted - 2012.05.28 02:14:00 -
[3] - Quote
Welsige wrote:
where your security is provided by other fellow and known players
That doesnt sound like deklein |

Aruken Marr
BSC LEGION Tactical Narcotics Team
128
|
Posted - 2012.05.28 10:16:00 -
[4] - Quote
Jessie-A Tassik wrote:
Why don't we take your CYNO blankie and your Local blankie away?
Bahahahahahahaha...
I'm more likely to get hot dropped than hot drop anyone. I dont think you understand how cyno's are used either. You think people make sure to undock with a cyno and a couple hundred people on stand-by just in case they get attacked? Please think about what you just said...
edit:
Oh I forgot you're that crazy conspiracy guy. Why would I even bother cyno'ing in a couple hundred people when I can get ccp to simply reverse my losses over skype? |

Aruken Marr
BSC LEGION Tactical Narcotics Team
129
|
Posted - 2012.05.28 14:04:00 -
[5] - Quote
Talon SilverHawk wrote:Mistah Ewedynao wrote:Well this has turned into a complete goon -alt-a- thon.
No surprise there huh CCP ??
CCP hasn't figured out a good PvP mechanism so they are just going with the Gooons "Content". Wonderful!
And an ex Goon is telling how cool the completely fail UI is gonna work for us.
CCP you got garbage in u house. Clean it up!
Goons will.fight the change because it puts a spanner in Mittani's economic plans. I mean why would anyone but a greifer really object to making hi sec a tad safer for certain activities, if its a case that its too easy to make isk mining in hi sec, what's hard about earning revenue shooting ships that can't fight back. Tal
Here's where your problem is, you fail to realise that players are getting paid by players to do these things. This isn't some over powered game mechanic where people are earning isk directly for shooting miners. This is player created content driven by market manipulation. This is exactly what makes this game great, the idea of a multinational community working together to make isk and have fun. It just so happens that this is at the expense of people who don't understand how this game works...
I think here-in lies the further problem. A lot of you hiseccers in your 10 man indi corps cant fully comprehend what a community of a 1000+ players driven by a single or collection of motives to achieve something massive is really like. You dont see the work that's gone into amassing the funds required to motivate such widespread destruction. I mean, it can't be much harder than afk mining for enough hours to earn the isk for a plex and maintain that manufacturing pos so you can afk mine some more and watch that sp counter/wallet balnce go up indefinately, can it? |

Aruken Marr
BSC LEGION Tactical Narcotics Team
131
|
Posted - 2012.05.28 14:35:00 -
[6] - Quote
Alavaria Fera wrote: The titans come from somewhere ~
They also go somewhere when you jump instead of bridge. But that's another issue ~
I thought they came from RMT? |

Aruken Marr
BSC LEGION Tactical Narcotics Team
136
|
Posted - 2012.05.28 21:16:00 -
[7] - Quote
Talon SilverHawk wrote:
Your argument fell flat the moment you claimed to know what any other player in the game has experience of.
So you're telling me that there aren't quite a lot of players who play like that; who play simply to collect shiny and when said shiny undergoes decompression in our lovely little vacuum they get mad and fail to understand that one of the core features of this game is that you're never truly safe. If there were a truly safe zone then the sandbox would be dead because there'd be areas where certain aspects of the sandbox are reduced to 0.
What exactly do you play for? It's not like any more anecdotal evidence wouldn't hurt.
Talon SilverHawk wrote:I'm not knocking what any large large entity including Goons have achieved even if I dislike their methods.
Still does not get away from the fact that its too easy and cheap to grief in hi sec. I like that hi sec can still be a dodgy place, but at the moment Its not balanced.
Like what baltec said, it's made easy by stupid players. You'd be surprised how many people shy away from chancing a tanked hulk. Then again there are plenty of people who'll go out of there way to kill that tanked hulk even if it costs them more than it's worth, simply because they can.
Quote:Lots of Goons in here as any change would affect Mittanis plans adversely.
Again why would anybody but a griefer complain about losing the chance to shoot defenceless targets in hi sec ?
Tal
So basically you don't like the way some people play this game. So you'd like to get ccp to marginalise a specific demographic. To a certain extent you're the pot calling the kettle black here. |
| |
|